Was It a Fair Trial
The book Was It a Fair Trial was written by author Here you can read free online of Was It a Fair Trial book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Was It a Fair Trial a good or bad book?
Where can I read Was It a Fair Trial for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Was It a Fair Trial Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Was It a Fair Trial
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Was It a Fair Trial Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Was It a Fair Trial
What reading level is Was It a Fair Trial book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Thus in referring to Fielden's testimony the court says : " It was for the jury to determine whether he told the truth or not. They had a right to consider that he was on trial for murder, " All through the argument in the trial below, the jury were urged by coun- sel for the State to disbelieve the testimony of the defendants, because they were on trial. Here again the prosecution takes advantage of its own wrong. Having joined the defendants in the trial against their earnest protest, the Sta...te urges its own wrong doing as a reason for disbelieving them. Had they been separately tried, this reason would not have existed except as to the value of each man's testimony for himself. Each man not on trial would have been a credible witness for the others. At all events, it could not have been objected to his testimony that he was on trial for his life.
UNFAIR TACTICS OF THE STATE'S ATTORNEY.
The course pursued by the counsel for the State was unfair throughout the trial. A few examples of the strategy and tactics they employed will prove this accusation.
What to read after Was It a Fair Trial?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Matthew Mark Trumbull to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Thus in referring to Fielden's testimony the court says : " It was for the jury to determine whether he told the truth or not. They had a right to consider that he was on trial for murder, " All through the argument in the trial below, the jury were urged by coun- sel for the State to disbelieve the testimony of the defendants, because they were on trial. Here again the prosecution takes advantage of its own wrong. Having joined the defendants in the trial against their earnest protest, the Sta...te urges its own wrong doing as a reason for disbelieving them. Had they been separately tried, this reason would not have existed except as to the value of each man's testimony for himself. Each man not on trial would have been a credible witness for the others. At all events, it could not have been objected to his testimony that he was on trial for his life.
UNFAIR TACTICS OF THE STATE'S ATTORNEY.
The course pursued by the counsel for the State was unfair throughout the trial. A few examples of the strategy and tactics they employed will prove this accusation.
What to read after Was It a Fair Trial?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Matthew Mark Trumbull to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
Guest
Read Also
8 / 10
User Reviews: