Amateur Work volume 6 No 1
Amateur Work volume 6 No 1
The book Amateur Work volume 6 No 1 was written by author Here you can read free online of Amateur Work volume 6 No 1 book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Amateur Work volume 6 No 1 a good or bad book?
Where can I read Amateur Work volume 6 No 1 for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Amateur Work volume 6 No 1 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Amateur Work volume 6 No 1
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Amateur Work volume 6 No 1 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Amateur Work volume 6 No 1
What reading level is Amateur Work volume 6 No 1 book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
When dealing in such large numbers and using factors of safety of 3 or 4 it is necessary to estimate only approximately, and slide rule calculations are wholly adequate for most of the preliminary work.
Assume that the impregnated paper between the pies has a thickness of . 006 in. Per sheet. This insulation must withstand, for the method of connection which has been chosen, double the potential generated by a single pie. Or 6000 volts, roughly. From the accom- panying table it is seen that thi...s paper will rupture at 1200 volts per 1/1, 000 inch. Using a factor of safety of 4 there will be obtained 1800 volts per sheet, which would require four sheets between each pie or section.
The winding will 7iow take up (50 pies x 1/8 in. Each 7 1/2 in. And another 1/2 in. For the four end coils, making 8 in. Four thicknesses of paper x . 006 in. Per sheet x 64 coils = approximately 1 1/2 in. For the total thickness of the paper and 9 1/2 in. For the entire secondary. It has been found that a good length for the secondary might be considered that of the sparking distance of the coil if it is desired to err on the side of safety and have the least danger of the spark jumping inside of the secondary or across the surface.
What to read after Amateur Work volume 6 No 1?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Floyd William Parsons to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
When dealing in such large numbers and using factors of safety of 3 or 4 it is necessary to estimate only approximately, and slide rule calculations are wholly adequate for most of the preliminary work.
Assume that the impregnated paper between the pies has a thickness of . 006 in. Per sheet. This insulation must withstand, for the method of connection which has been chosen, double the potential generated by a single pie. Or 6000 volts, roughly. From the accom- panying table it is seen that thi...s paper will rupture at 1200 volts per 1/1, 000 inch. Using a factor of safety of 4 there will be obtained 1800 volts per sheet, which would require four sheets between each pie or section.
The winding will 7iow take up (50 pies x 1/8 in. Each 7 1/2 in. And another 1/2 in. For the four end coils, making 8 in. Four thicknesses of paper x . 006 in. Per sheet x 64 coils = approximately 1 1/2 in. For the total thickness of the paper and 9 1/2 in. For the entire secondary. It has been found that a good length for the secondary might be considered that of the sparking distance of the coil if it is desired to err on the side of safety and have the least danger of the spark jumping inside of the secondary or across the surface.
What to read after Amateur Work volume 6 No 1?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Floyd William Parsons to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
User Reviews: