An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament
An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament
The book An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament was written by author Here you can read free online of An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament a good or bad book?
Where can I read An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament
What reading level is An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
158-165; McGiffert*), or a Jacobean nucleus (Oesterley), to which later excerpts from other writings were added, may be postulated. The conjecture (G. C. Martin, ExpJ iii. 174-184) that the writing was originally a collection of logia with comments made by James the brother of Jesus, and issued in his name after a. D. 70 as a treatise on practical Christianity, helps to reconcile the late circulation of the book with its primitive character, and clears up the address ; but it does not explain 2...^^"^*^, and it Hes open to most of the objections valid against any theory of apostolic authorship, though it is better than Weizsacker's (AA. Ii. 27 f. ) similar hypothesis of an Ebionitic anti-Pauline tract, containing glosses and expansions of Matthsean logia, written not by James but by some one after a. D. 70.
The question of the date thus depends upon the crucial problem of the authorship, and that in turn falls to be decided primarily upon two internal features, the religious colour and the style.
What to read after An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by James Moffatt to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
158-165; McGiffert*), or a Jacobean nucleus (Oesterley), to which later excerpts from other writings were added, may be postulated. The conjecture (G. C. Martin, ExpJ iii. 174-184) that the writing was originally a collection of logia with comments made by James the brother of Jesus, and issued in his name after a. D. 70 as a treatise on practical Christianity, helps to reconcile the late circulation of the book with its primitive character, and clears up the address ; but it does not explain 2...^^"^*^, and it Hes open to most of the objections valid against any theory of apostolic authorship, though it is better than Weizsacker's (AA. Ii. 27 f. ) similar hypothesis of an Ebionitic anti-Pauline tract, containing glosses and expansions of Matthsean logia, written not by James but by some one after a. D. 70.
The question of the date thus depends upon the crucial problem of the authorship, and that in turn falls to be decided primarily upon two internal features, the religious colour and the style.
What to read after An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by James Moffatt to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
User Reviews: