Hearings Before the Committee On Expenditures in the Post Office Department ... Nos. 73-74
Hearings Before the Committee On Expenditures in the Post Office Department ... Nos. 73-74
The book Hearings Before the Committee On Expenditures in the Post Office Department ... Nos. 73-74 was written by author Here you can read free online of Hearings Before the Committee On Expenditures in the Post Office Department ... Nos. 73-74 book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Hearings Before the Committee On Expenditures in the Post Office Department ... Nos. 73-74 a good or bad book?
Where can I read Hearings Before the Committee On Expenditures in the Post Office Department ... Nos. 73-74 for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Hearings Before the Committee On Expenditures in the Post Office Department ... Nos. 73-74 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Hearings Before the Committee On Expenditures in the Post Office Department ... Nos. 73-74
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Hearings Before the Committee On Expenditures in the Post Office Department ... Nos. 73-74 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Hearings Before the Committee On Expenditures in the Post Office Department ... Nos. 73-74
What reading level is Hearings Before the Committee On Expenditures in the Post Office Department ... Nos. 73-74 book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
No, sir.
Mr. McCoy. Were you not on the committee to open the bids ?
Mr. BusHNELL. No*^ committee had been appointed for opening those particular bids.
Mr. McCoY. But the report of the committee which recommended the change in the situation was a report of your committee, was it not ?
Mr. BusHNELL. Yes, sir.
Mr. McCoy. And it was entitled, ''supplemental report''?
Mr. BusHNELL. Yes.
Mr. McCoy. Supplementing something that the committee had done before, wasn't it?
Mr. BusHNELL. Yes.
Mr. McCoy. A...nd the committee thought then that it was in pos- session of its full powers when they made that recommendation f Mr. BusHNELL. Yes, sir.
Mr. McCoy. Was there any opinion of the Assistant Attorney General submitted to the department between the 6th day of Decem- ber, 1912, and the day when the bids were to have been opened?
Mr. BusHNELL. The one that you have there; yes, sir. That is the only one that I know of.
*Mr. McCoy. Why were not the bids opened ?
Mr. BusuNELL. 1 think the Assistant Attorney General advised the Postmaster General that in view of the fact that action had been suspended on the former award that it would not be advisable to open those bids.
What to read after Hearings Before the Committee On Expenditures in the Post Office Department ... Nos. 73-74?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by United States. Congress. House. Committee On Expenditures in the Post-Office Department to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
No, sir.
Mr. McCoy. Were you not on the committee to open the bids ?
Mr. BusHNELL. No*^ committee had been appointed for opening those particular bids.
Mr. McCoY. But the report of the committee which recommended the change in the situation was a report of your committee, was it not ?
Mr. BusHNELL. Yes, sir.
Mr. McCoy. And it was entitled, ''supplemental report''?
Mr. BusHNELL. Yes.
Mr. McCoy. Supplementing something that the committee had done before, wasn't it?
Mr. BusHNELL. Yes.
Mr. McCoy. A...nd the committee thought then that it was in pos- session of its full powers when they made that recommendation f Mr. BusHNELL. Yes, sir.
Mr. McCoy. Was there any opinion of the Assistant Attorney General submitted to the department between the 6th day of Decem- ber, 1912, and the day when the bids were to have been opened?
Mr. BusHNELL. The one that you have there; yes, sir. That is the only one that I know of.
*Mr. McCoy. Why were not the bids opened ?
Mr. BusuNELL. 1 think the Assistant Attorney General advised the Postmaster General that in view of the fact that action had been suspended on the former award that it would not be advisable to open those bids.
What to read after Hearings Before the Committee On Expenditures in the Post Office Department ... Nos. 73-74?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by United States. Congress. House. Committee On Expenditures in the Post-Office Department to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
Guest
Read Also
9 / 10
User Reviews: