Investigation of the Relative Effectiveness of Three Methods of Utilizing Laboratory Activities in Selected Topics of Junior College Mathematics.
Investigation of the Relative Effectiveness of Three Methods of Utilizing Laboratory Activities in Selected Topics of Junior College Mathematics.
The book Investigation of the Relative Effectiveness of Three Methods of Utilizing Laboratory Activities in Selected Topics of Junior College Mathematics. was written by author Here you can read free online of Investigation of the Relative Effectiveness of Three Methods of Utilizing Laboratory Activities in Selected Topics of Junior College Mathematics. book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Investigation of the Relative Effectiveness of Three Methods of Utilizing Laboratory Activities in Selected Topics of Junior College Mathematics. a good or bad book?
Where can I read Investigation of the Relative Effectiveness of Three Methods of Utilizing Laboratory Activities in Selected Topics of Junior College Mathematics. for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Investigation of the Relative Effectiveness of Three Methods of Utilizing Laboratory Activities in Selected Topics of Junior College Mathematics. Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Investigation of the Relative Effectiveness of Three Methods of Utilizing Laboratory Activities in Selected Topics of Junior College Mathematics.
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Investigation of the Relative Effectiveness of Three Methods of Utilizing Laboratory Activities in Selected Topics of Junior College Mathematics. Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Investigation of the Relative Effectiveness of Three Methods of Utilizing Laboratory Activities in Selected Topics of Junior College Mathematics.
What reading level is Investigation of the Relative Effectiveness of Three Methods of Utilizing Laboratory Activities in Selected Topics of Junior College Mathematics. book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Hypotheses HI 1 -HI 3 state that there are no significant differences among the mean error scores on the posttest of low-achievers in the three treatment groups. The F-values found in Table V indicate that both main effects are not significant at the 0.0.5 level of confidence. The F-ratio of 1.501 for method-achievement interaction also is less than that required for significance at the 0.05 confidence level. Therefore, we cannot reject the hypothesis of no interaction. This also means that we ...can reject none of the hypotheses H5-H13* Use of Scheffe's Method to compare the differences between the posttest and pretest mean error scores for average-achievers indicates that the exploratory-discovery group achieved a significantly greater reduction in mean error scores than either of the other methods. This is shown by the 95 percent confidence intervals found in Table XI.
43 TABLE XI: 95 Percent Confidence Intervals for Comparisons Among the Ave rage -Ac hie vers in the Exploratory- Discovery Group, the Verification-Application Group and the Combination Group Method Exploratory-Discovery minus Verification-Application Exploratory -Disco very minus Combination Verification-Application minus Combination Use of Scheffe's Method to compare the differences between the posttest and pretest mean error scores for low- achievers indicates that the combination group achieved a significantly greater reduction in mean error scores than the exploratory-discovery group.
What to read after Investigation of the Relative Effectiveness of Three Methods of Utilizing Laboratory Activities in Selected Topics of Junior College Mathematics.?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Golliday, Joan Maries, 1942- to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Hypotheses HI 1 -HI 3 state that there are no significant differences among the mean error scores on the posttest of low-achievers in the three treatment groups. The F-values found in Table V indicate that both main effects are not significant at the 0.0.5 level of confidence. The F-ratio of 1.501 for method-achievement interaction also is less than that required for significance at the 0.05 confidence level. Therefore, we cannot reject the hypothesis of no interaction. This also means that we ...can reject none of the hypotheses H5-H13* Use of Scheffe's Method to compare the differences between the posttest and pretest mean error scores for average-achievers indicates that the exploratory-discovery group achieved a significantly greater reduction in mean error scores than either of the other methods. This is shown by the 95 percent confidence intervals found in Table XI.
43 TABLE XI: 95 Percent Confidence Intervals for Comparisons Among the Ave rage -Ac hie vers in the Exploratory- Discovery Group, the Verification-Application Group and the Combination Group Method Exploratory-Discovery minus Verification-Application Exploratory -Disco very minus Combination Verification-Application minus Combination Use of Scheffe's Method to compare the differences between the posttest and pretest mean error scores for low- achievers indicates that the combination group achieved a significantly greater reduction in mean error scores than the exploratory-discovery group.
What to read after Investigation of the Relative Effectiveness of Three Methods of Utilizing Laboratory Activities in Selected Topics of Junior College Mathematics.?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Golliday, Joan Maries, 1942- to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
User Reviews: