Liability of Master to Servant
The book Liability of Master to Servant was written by author Here you can read free online of Liability of Master to Servant book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Liability of Master to Servant a good or bad book?
Where can I read Liability of Master to Servant for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Liability of Master to Servant Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Liability of Master to Servant
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Liability of Master to Servant Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Liability of Master to Servant
What reading level is Liability of Master to Servant book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
832, 25 L. J. 185, Ex. , the rule was held to apply whei-e Wiggett, the person injured, was the servant of Moss, a piece-worker or sub-contractor, and he by whose negligence the injury was occasioned was in the immediate employ of the defendants ; but in that case it is to be observed that, although Wiggett was engaged by the piece-worker, it was a part of the arrangement between the latter and the defendant that the workmen should be paid their weekly wages by the defendant; so that, as was sa...id by Martin, B. , in the course of the argument, Moss was not a sub-contractor in the sense that an action would lie against him by a stranger. In Wilson v. Merry, in the House of Lords, 19 L. T. Rep. (n. S. ) 30, L. Rep. I Scotch App. 326, it was held that the master was»protected, although the fellow-servant whose negligence caused the injury was a manager. So in Morgan v. The Vale of Neath Rail- way Company, 18 L. T. Rep. (n. S. ) 564, 5 B. & S. 570, 736, L. Rep. I Q. B. 149; and Lavell v. Howell, 34 L.
What to read after Liability of Master to Servant?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Francis Wharton to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
832, 25 L. J. 185, Ex. , the rule was held to apply whei-e Wiggett, the person injured, was the servant of Moss, a piece-worker or sub-contractor, and he by whose negligence the injury was occasioned was in the immediate employ of the defendants ; but in that case it is to be observed that, although Wiggett was engaged by the piece-worker, it was a part of the arrangement between the latter and the defendant that the workmen should be paid their weekly wages by the defendant; so that, as was sa...id by Martin, B. , in the course of the argument, Moss was not a sub-contractor in the sense that an action would lie against him by a stranger. In Wilson v. Merry, in the House of Lords, 19 L. T. Rep. (n. S. ) 30, L. Rep. I Scotch App. 326, it was held that the master was»protected, although the fellow-servant whose negligence caused the injury was a manager. So in Morgan v. The Vale of Neath Rail- way Company, 18 L. T. Rep. (n. S. ) 564, 5 B. & S. 570, 736, L. Rep. I Q. B. 149; and Lavell v. Howell, 34 L.
What to read after Liability of Master to Servant?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Francis Wharton to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
User Reviews: