Metaphysical Presuppositions of Ritschl
The book Metaphysical Presuppositions of Ritschl was written by author Here you can read free online of Metaphysical Presuppositions of Ritschl book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Metaphysical Presuppositions of Ritschl a good or bad book?
Where can I read Metaphysical Presuppositions of Ritschl for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Metaphysical Presuppositions of Ritschl Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Metaphysical Presuppositions of Ritschl
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Metaphysical Presuppositions of Ritschl Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Metaphysical Presuppositions of Ritschl
What reading level is Metaphysical Presuppositions of Ritschl book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Traub's criticism of Pfleiderer is correct. It is probable that he has not correctly interpreted Pfleiderer, but it is certain that the latter did not do justice to Ritschl. When Ritschl rejects the soul- in-itself, it is the scholastic entity that he has in mind. When Pfleiderer affirms the "in itself" of the soul, he does not mean it in the scholastic sense. Ritschl's position is here again a reflection of Lotze. '»4 Lotze rejects the scholastic conception of soul-substance. The relating acti...vity of consciousness affirms its necessary unity. ''It is not through a substance that things have being, but they have being when they are able to produce the appearance of a substance present in them. " If Lotze used the term "substance" for the soul, he had in mind nothing more than the unity of consciousness. He considers that the idea of a substance as a sort of atom under each individual thing or soul is absurd. He chides Kant because, while he shows conclusively that the soul in the scholastic sense would be absolutely unknowable, he still seems to imply that, if we could only know it, we should have some very valuable knowledge.
What to read after Metaphysical Presuppositions of Ritschl?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Wilfred Currier Keirstead to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Traub's criticism of Pfleiderer is correct. It is probable that he has not correctly interpreted Pfleiderer, but it is certain that the latter did not do justice to Ritschl. When Ritschl rejects the soul- in-itself, it is the scholastic entity that he has in mind. When Pfleiderer affirms the "in itself" of the soul, he does not mean it in the scholastic sense. Ritschl's position is here again a reflection of Lotze. '»4 Lotze rejects the scholastic conception of soul-substance. The relating acti...vity of consciousness affirms its necessary unity. ''It is not through a substance that things have being, but they have being when they are able to produce the appearance of a substance present in them. " If Lotze used the term "substance" for the soul, he had in mind nothing more than the unity of consciousness. He considers that the idea of a substance as a sort of atom under each individual thing or soul is absurd. He chides Kant because, while he shows conclusively that the soul in the scholastic sense would be absolutely unknowable, he still seems to imply that, if we could only know it, we should have some very valuable knowledge.
What to read after Metaphysical Presuppositions of Ritschl?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Wilfred Currier Keirstead to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
Guest
Read Also
9 / 10
8 / 10
User Reviews: