Millenarianism Defended: Reply to Prof. Stuart's "strictures On the Rev. G ...
Millenarianism Defended: Reply to Prof. Stuart's "strictures On the Rev. G ...
George Duffield
The book Millenarianism Defended: Reply to Prof. Stuart's "strictures On the Rev. G ... was written by author George Duffield Here you can read free online of Millenarianism Defended: Reply to Prof. Stuart's "strictures On the Rev. G ... book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Millenarianism Defended: Reply to Prof. Stuart's "strictures On the Rev. G ... a good or bad book?
What reading level is Millenarianism Defended: Reply to Prof. Stuart's "strictures On the Rev. G ... book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
If he had adduced ar^[tmeni$ to confirm hi^ ^^^n^tion, they 90 nigl]tbe*]det; but k wcve folly to xMBtetr-iAjffi^Acms^ tfter tke argnnentSy of Mede, Newton and a/theHBf and the alnuNtt ** tadpa^nl cusiom" ^ ccnniBematprsi as FutS^mcfr 8, admits, wlA B€diHig hvfi iii»aaBex wbieh eyen- Profeaaor S« himadf iv eoBstruned \3b adiait, being tbei«eftreneceB^tated to^ezplattr JeaephHs's appwrently contradicterj eutemeata Apt>. p. 8&. it wiH be time eno«gh to add^aq^ tfaing fortber o» tbb peist^ when be...prodaee?. someUti)^ like arg«uettt in anpport of bis aa aer tio ns veA e oBj ee tu#ea> ^ If, oB the other hand, they are years or symbidical:^ay^ iajai«jmb«p 1260; tbey are not yet jrmi 'ont^ so tbai^ take^it mi\&i wtLYf the argnment is^ oet ^cffscted. Ui^er ano&or bead, when q»eycing of thesigm} of Cteif^'s coming, I hanre glanced at this subject) for the pui^xMie of showing bow^im- ptq>er it is ta ^peak positirely with regard to dates, as some }mre d^ae, givi&g a variety of periods,, adepted by tbo6# w4io hare believed ^ prophetic 4iree and a half year» to hafe been 1260^ years ; but, at the same tim,ey expressed my doubts,, and dissent, ht reasons s^ted from those who Im^ liere and teaoh that the witnesses have been sliiin^ and who express tb^naeives vagnely about tbe personal Antichrist, inUmatlttg, as my ^tpimm cmfy, that tbe rise of Antichrist in^ bis last form, and tbe slaughter of the witness^, may yet be foture ; eo that the three years and a half may yet htaver the Iitei;;al folfillmeni they never have had to Chi»day.
User Reviews: