Notes And Queries, Number 49, October 5, 1850
The book Notes And Queries, Number 49, October 5, 1850 was written by author Here you can read free online of Notes And Queries, Number 49, October 5, 1850 book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Notes And Queries, Number 49, October 5, 1850 a good or bad book?
Where can I read Notes And Queries, Number 49, October 5, 1850 for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Notes And Queries, Number 49, October 5, 1850 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Notes And Queries, Number 49, October 5, 1850
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Notes And Queries, Number 49, October 5, 1850 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Notes And Queries, Number 49, October 5, 1850
What reading level is Notes And Queries, Number 49, October 5, 1850 book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
The precedence of bishops over barons was clearly _disputed_ in thereign of King Henry VI. , when Baker says in his _Chronicle_ (p. 204. ), _judgment_ was given for the _lords temporal_; but where the judgment, or any account of the dispute for precedence, is to be found I cannotsay. That is what your correspondent G. Inquired for (Vol. Ii. , p. 76. ).
C. G.
Your correspondent ARUN (Vol. Ii. , p. 254. ) states, on the authority ofStephen's _Blackstone_, that-- "Bishops are temporal barons, and ...sit in the House of Peers in right of succession to certain ancient baronies annexed or supposed to be annexed to their episcopal lands. " This position, though supported by Lord Coke in more places than one(see _Coke upon Littleton_, 134. _a, b_; 3 _Inst. _ 30. ; 4 _Inst. _ 44. ), and adopted by most other legal text-writers on his authority, cannot, it is conceived, be supported. It seems to be clearly ascertained thatbishops sat in the great councils of this and other kingdoms not_ratione baroniarum_ but _jure ecclesiarum_, by custom, long before thetenure _per baroniam_ was known.
What to read after Notes And Queries, Number 49, October 5, 1850?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Various to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
The precedence of bishops over barons was clearly _disputed_ in thereign of King Henry VI. , when Baker says in his _Chronicle_ (p. 204. ), _judgment_ was given for the _lords temporal_; but where the judgment, or any account of the dispute for precedence, is to be found I cannotsay. That is what your correspondent G. Inquired for (Vol. Ii. , p. 76. ).
C. G.
Your correspondent ARUN (Vol. Ii. , p. 254. ) states, on the authority ofStephen's _Blackstone_, that-- "Bishops are temporal barons, and ...sit in the House of Peers in right of succession to certain ancient baronies annexed or supposed to be annexed to their episcopal lands. " This position, though supported by Lord Coke in more places than one(see _Coke upon Littleton_, 134. _a, b_; 3 _Inst. _ 30. ; 4 _Inst. _ 44. ), and adopted by most other legal text-writers on his authority, cannot, it is conceived, be supported. It seems to be clearly ascertained thatbishops sat in the great councils of this and other kingdoms not_ratione baroniarum_ but _jure ecclesiarum_, by custom, long before thetenure _per baroniam_ was known.
What to read after Notes And Queries, Number 49, October 5, 1850?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Various to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
User Reviews: