Notes On the Text of the Corpus Tibullianum
Notes On the Text of the Corpus Tibullianum
The book Notes On the Text of the Corpus Tibullianum was written by author Here you can read free online of Notes On the Text of the Corpus Tibullianum book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Notes On the Text of the Corpus Tibullianum a good or bad book?
Where can I read Notes On the Text of the Corpus Tibullianum for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Notes On the Text of the Corpus Tibullianum Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Notes On the Text of the Corpus Tibullianum
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Notes On the Text of the Corpus Tibullianum Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Notes On the Text of the Corpus Tibullianum
What reading level is Notes On the Text of the Corpus Tibullianum book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
For qui, £ have quae. Instead of abduc, V reads abducit; £, abducis. Some inferior MSS read quia ducis, where A has qui abduc.
All editors, as far as I know, read Nemesim or Nemesin 83 and change abducit or ducit to the second person. 84 (Rigler proposed quae abduxit). A typical reading is that of Hiller: at tibi dura seges, Nemesim qui abducis ab urbe, persolvat nulla semina certa fide.
82 So Hiller and Wilhelm: abducit say Baehrens and Postgate. See Wochenschrift fur Mass. Phil. , 23 (1906), ...1148.
83 In Berliner phil. Wochenschrift, 29 (1909), 1467, Cartault (1909)— whose work I have not seen — is said to read ' ' At tibi dura seges Nemesis qui abducit ab urbe. ' ' 84 Save F. Wilhelm, N. Jahrb. F. Phil. U. Paed. , 151 (1895), 770, who defends abducit, its subject being qui which in turn refers to tibi, by Tib. I, 2, 33. This does not appear analogous. But in Rhein. Museum 59 (1904), 283, he discusses the passage, reading abducis. Belling (Prolego- mena, 62) approves of quia ducit, but in his "Tibullus" he reverts to quae abducis.
What to read after Notes On the Text of the Corpus Tibullianum?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Monroe E Monroe Emanuel Deutsch to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
For qui, £ have quae. Instead of abduc, V reads abducit; £, abducis. Some inferior MSS read quia ducis, where A has qui abduc.
All editors, as far as I know, read Nemesim or Nemesin 83 and change abducit or ducit to the second person. 84 (Rigler proposed quae abduxit). A typical reading is that of Hiller: at tibi dura seges, Nemesim qui abducis ab urbe, persolvat nulla semina certa fide.
82 So Hiller and Wilhelm: abducit say Baehrens and Postgate. See Wochenschrift fur Mass. Phil. , 23 (1906), ...1148.
83 In Berliner phil. Wochenschrift, 29 (1909), 1467, Cartault (1909)— whose work I have not seen — is said to read ' ' At tibi dura seges Nemesis qui abducit ab urbe. ' ' 84 Save F. Wilhelm, N. Jahrb. F. Phil. U. Paed. , 151 (1895), 770, who defends abducit, its subject being qui which in turn refers to tibi, by Tib. I, 2, 33. This does not appear analogous. But in Rhein. Museum 59 (1904), 283, he discusses the passage, reading abducis. Belling (Prolego- mena, 62) approves of quia ducit, but in his "Tibullus" he reverts to quae abducis.
What to read after Notes On the Text of the Corpus Tibullianum?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Monroe E Monroe Emanuel Deutsch to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
User Reviews: