Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1956 Pt.1
The book Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1956 Pt.1 was written by author Here you can read free online of Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1956 Pt.1 book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1956 Pt.1 a good or bad book?
Where can I read Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1956 Pt.1 for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1956 Pt.1 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1956 Pt.1
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1956 Pt.1 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1956 Pt.1
What reading level is Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1956 Pt.1 book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
The City further alleged in Its protest that the roads within the Airport are not public roads or part of the public highways or dedicated to public use; and Pacific Greyhound Lines must obtain a permit from the City to enter the property of the Airport owned by the City and County of San Francisco.
opinion No. 105^ February 17, 1956 Page k In the Fialer'3 Limousine case, 53 Cal. P.U.C. 263, the City's position that it had the right to ^ive an exclusive contract to P3arrett Garages, Inc. was up...held. Pialer' s exhausted every possible means (State, U. S. Suioreme Courts) in its effort to continue to carry on its transportation business at the itirport and have the contract between City and Barrett declared void.
Pacific Greyhound Lines' position is analogous to Pialer' s.
It has a certificate of public convenience and necessity to use the public highways in transporting passengers, but as was pointed out in the Commission' s brief in opposition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States at page II4., lervice involved, it is necessary to have two le^al rights; first, a certificate of public convenience and neces- sity to operate on the public highways, and, second, the right from the City and County to r>ick up passengers at the Airport." It must be conceded that Pacific Greyhound Lines in picking up passengers at the Airport, is doing so solely through sufferance and needs an amendment of its present certificate from the Public Utilities Commission of the State and a permit from the Public Utilities Commission of the City and County of San Francisco before it is entitled to enter the San Francisco International Airport, As to Resolution No, l5i;09 of Hay 16, 1955* passed by the Public Utilities Commission and referred to in your request for opinion, it purports to £lve to the Pacific Greyhound Lines a 1)ermit to occupy approximately 6OO square feet of space as Indicated on Drawing BA-10575j to operate as a licensed public Interurban bus carrier on a re^iular schedule under State authority at locations on the Airport as designated by Airport Manager." Section 6(a) of the Barrett agreement purports to extend to "licensed public interurban bus carriers operating on a regular schedule under State authority" the privilege of loading and unload- ing at stops other than the loading areas assigned to Company (Barrett Garages, Inc.) on Airport and as specifically designated by Manager, The verbiage of the resolution attempts to follow the wording of Section 6(a) of the agreement.
What to read after Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1956 Pt.1?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by San Francisco (Calif.). City Attorney's Office to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
The City further alleged in Its protest that the roads within the Airport are not public roads or part of the public highways or dedicated to public use; and Pacific Greyhound Lines must obtain a permit from the City to enter the property of the Airport owned by the City and County of San Francisco.
opinion No. 105^ February 17, 1956 Page k In the Fialer'3 Limousine case, 53 Cal. P.U.C. 263, the City's position that it had the right to ^ive an exclusive contract to P3arrett Garages, Inc. was up...held. Pialer' s exhausted every possible means (State, U. S. Suioreme Courts) in its effort to continue to carry on its transportation business at the itirport and have the contract between City and Barrett declared void.
Pacific Greyhound Lines' position is analogous to Pialer' s.
It has a certificate of public convenience and necessity to use the public highways in transporting passengers, but as was pointed out in the Commission' s brief in opposition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States at page II4., lervice involved, it is necessary to have two le^al rights; first, a certificate of public convenience and neces- sity to operate on the public highways, and, second, the right from the City and County to r>ick up passengers at the Airport." It must be conceded that Pacific Greyhound Lines in picking up passengers at the Airport, is doing so solely through sufferance and needs an amendment of its present certificate from the Public Utilities Commission of the State and a permit from the Public Utilities Commission of the City and County of San Francisco before it is entitled to enter the San Francisco International Airport, As to Resolution No, l5i;09 of Hay 16, 1955* passed by the Public Utilities Commission and referred to in your request for opinion, it purports to £lve to the Pacific Greyhound Lines a 1)ermit to occupy approximately 6OO square feet of space as Indicated on Drawing BA-10575j to operate as a licensed public Interurban bus carrier on a re^iular schedule under State authority at locations on the Airport as designated by Airport Manager." Section 6(a) of the Barrett agreement purports to extend to "licensed public interurban bus carriers operating on a regular schedule under State authority" the privilege of loading and unload- ing at stops other than the loading areas assigned to Company (Barrett Garages, Inc.) on Airport and as specifically designated by Manager, The verbiage of the resolution attempts to follow the wording of Section 6(a) of the agreement.
What to read after Opinions of the City Attorney of San Francisco 1956 Pt.1?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by San Francisco (Calif.). City Attorney's Office to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
User Reviews: