Philology of the Gospels
The book Philology of the Gospels was written by author Here you can read free online of Philology of the Gospels book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Philology of the Gospels a good or bad book?
Where can I read Philology of the Gospels for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Philology of the Gospels Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Philology of the Gospels
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Philology of the Gospels Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Philology of the Gospels
What reading level is Philology of the Gospels book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
, "Jesus was, when He came (to the baptism), about thirty years old, as was supposed, and the son of Joseph, " etc.
TEXTUAL DIFFICULTIES IN LUKE'S GOSPEL. 171 be taxed with Mary his wife, 1 because they were of the house and lineage of David. " This reading gives also a good reason for Mary's accompanying Joseph on this journey, instead of remaining in Nazareth, which would otherwise have been more convenient to her condition. But as Luke expressly says, " the son of Joseph, who was the son " e...tc. , it is clear that at least according to his own opinion, he did not give here the forefathers of Mary. What I have to discuss in this place is the very remarkable fact that, if we are to credit D, the discrepancy between Matthew and Luke is altogether non-existent, because D (but D alone in this case) gives the same names of the forefathers as Matthew does. The order of course is the inverse, being the ascending, as we call it, while Matthew has the descending order. But is not this a clear case of assimilation of one Gospel to another ?
What to read after Philology of the Gospels?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Friedrich Blass to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
, "Jesus was, when He came (to the baptism), about thirty years old, as was supposed, and the son of Joseph, " etc.
TEXTUAL DIFFICULTIES IN LUKE'S GOSPEL. 171 be taxed with Mary his wife, 1 because they were of the house and lineage of David. " This reading gives also a good reason for Mary's accompanying Joseph on this journey, instead of remaining in Nazareth, which would otherwise have been more convenient to her condition. But as Luke expressly says, " the son of Joseph, who was the son " e...tc. , it is clear that at least according to his own opinion, he did not give here the forefathers of Mary. What I have to discuss in this place is the very remarkable fact that, if we are to credit D, the discrepancy between Matthew and Luke is altogether non-existent, because D (but D alone in this case) gives the same names of the forefathers as Matthew does. The order of course is the inverse, being the ascending, as we call it, while Matthew has the descending order. But is not this a clear case of assimilation of one Gospel to another ?
What to read after Philology of the Gospels?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Friedrich Blass to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
User Reviews: