Reports of Cases At Law And in Chancery Argued ..., volume 62; volume 92

Cover Reports of Cases At Law And in Chancery Argued ..., volume 62; volume 92
Reports of Cases At Law And in Chancery Argued ..., volume 62; volume 92
Illinois. Supreme Court
The book Reports of Cases At Law And in Chancery Argued ..., volume 62; volume 92 was written by author Here you can read free online of Reports of Cases At Law And in Chancery Argued ..., volume 62; volume 92 book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Reports of Cases At Law And in Chancery Argued ..., volume 62; volume 92 a good or bad book?
Where can I read Reports of Cases At Law And in Chancery Argued ..., volume 62; volume 92 for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Reports of Cases At Law And in Chancery Argued ..., volume 62; volume 92 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Reports of Cases At Law And in Chancery Argued ..., volume 62; volume 92
What reading level is Reports of Cases At Law And in Chancery Argued ..., volume 62; volume 92 book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:

Parrott.
''Subscribed and sworn to before me, this 25th day of Jan- nary, 1877.
John A. Reeve." Messrs. Green & Gilbebt, for the appellant: The alteration in the deed was not sufficiently explained.
The People, use, etc. v. Organ et aL 27 111. 27.
The certificate of acknowledgment was defective. TuUy v.
Davis, 30 111. 103; Gove v. Gather, 23 id. 624.
Messrs. Linegar & Lansden, for the appellee, in respect to the sufficiency of the certificate of acknowledgment^ cited Hartshorn v. Dawson, 79 111
.... 108.
Digitized by VjOOQIC 1879.] C. & St. L. R. R. Co. v. Parrott. 197 opinion of the Court Mr. Jdstic£ Scott delivered the opiniou of the Court: It 18 said the deed under which plaintiff claims title to the premises in controversy was inadmissible in evidence, because of the alleged alteration that was said to appear on the face of the deed. The word "south" is written over the word ^^ north/' in the description of the land conveyed, and it is that which is said to invalidate the deed.
It is quite clear, from the evidence, that the alleged altera- tion in the description of the land was made before the deed was executed and delivered to the grantee.


What to read after Reports of Cases At Law And in Chancery Argued ..., volume 62; volume 92?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Illinois. Supreme Court to read online
MoreLess
10
Tokens
Reports of Cases At Law And in Chancery Argued ..., volume 62; volume 92
+Write review

User Reviews:

Write Review:

Guest

Guest