Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the Court of ..., volume 183
Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the Court of ..., volume 183
The book Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the Court of ..., volume 183 was written by author Here you can read free online of Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the Court of ..., volume 183 book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the Court of ..., volume 183 a good or bad book?
Where can I read Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the Court of ..., volume 183 for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the Court of ..., volume 183 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the Court of ..., volume 183
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the Court of ..., volume 183 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the Court of ..., volume 183
What reading level is Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the Court of ..., volume 183 book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
S. 309; L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Patrick supra; Rase V Minneapolis, &c., Ry. Co. (Minn.), 21 L. R. A.
(N. S.) 138; Wiley v. C. N. 0. & T. P. Ry. Co., 161 Ky.«305 ; Lexington Railway Co. v. Cropper, 142 Ky. 39.
Appellant asserts that the employment by Donahue of the defective chisel, spike maul and clawbar amounts to contributory negligence only on his part, and not to an assumption of risk, but this is not borne out by the authorities. In the case of L. & N. Ry. Co. v. Patrick, supra, it was expres...sly held that in an action to recover Digitized by Google 614 KENTUCKY EEPORTS [Vol. 183 for injury received while working as a section hand by slivers or sprawls flying from the spike maul nsed by another section hand and furnished by the company, the injured servant was not entitled to damages if he knew of the defective condition of the spike maul and the danger of flying slivers therefrom, and continued to work in close proximity to the defective instrumen- tality without obtaining from the defendant or its fore- man an assurance that the defect would be remedied or the danger removed, for the reason that his continu- ance at such work was an assumption of the risk thereby entailed.
What to read after Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the Court of ..., volume 183?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Kentucky (District). Supreme Court, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
S. 309; L. & N. R. R. Co. v. Patrick supra; Rase V Minneapolis, &c., Ry. Co. (Minn.), 21 L. R. A.
(N. S.) 138; Wiley v. C. N. 0. & T. P. Ry. Co., 161 Ky.«305 ; Lexington Railway Co. v. Cropper, 142 Ky. 39.
Appellant asserts that the employment by Donahue of the defective chisel, spike maul and clawbar amounts to contributory negligence only on his part, and not to an assumption of risk, but this is not borne out by the authorities. In the case of L. & N. Ry. Co. v. Patrick, supra, it was expres...sly held that in an action to recover Digitized by Google 614 KENTUCKY EEPORTS [Vol. 183 for injury received while working as a section hand by slivers or sprawls flying from the spike maul nsed by another section hand and furnished by the company, the injured servant was not entitled to damages if he knew of the defective condition of the spike maul and the danger of flying slivers therefrom, and continued to work in close proximity to the defective instrumen- tality without obtaining from the defendant or its fore- man an assurance that the defect would be remedied or the danger removed, for the reason that his continu- ance at such work was an assumption of the risk thereby entailed.
What to read after Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the Court of ..., volume 183?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Kentucky (District). Supreme Court, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
Guest
Read Also
9 / 10
User Reviews: