Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the ..., volume 2; volume 79
Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the ..., volume 2; volume 79
The book Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the ..., volume 2; volume 79 was written by author Here you can read free online of Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the ..., volume 2; volume 79 book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the ..., volume 2; volume 79 a good or bad book?
Where can I read Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the ..., volume 2; volume 79 for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the ..., volume 2; volume 79 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the ..., volume 2; volume 79
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the ..., volume 2; volume 79 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the ..., volume 2; volume 79
What reading level is Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the ..., volume 2; volume 79 book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Digitized by Googk -VOL. Lxxix.] SEPTEMBER TERM, 1880. 163 Kentucky Central Railroad Company v. Thomas' adm'r.
In the first instruction given for the plaintiff, the court told the jury, in effect, that no fault on the part of the intes- tate, which did not contribute to the wrecking of the train, would authorize a verdict for the defendant, on the ground of contributory negligence, and refused to instruct, as asked by the defendant, that it was the duty of the intestate to •occupy a seat in one... of the passenger coaches, and that if he went voluntarily into the express car, and it was more dangerous to ride in that car than in a passenger car, and that his life was lost in consequence of his being in the •express car, they should find for the defendant.
That the intestate was a passenger, and entitled to the privileges and subject to the duties incident to that relation, is not disputed.
When the defense is contributory negligence, the proper question for the jury is, whether the damage was occasioned entirely by the negligence or improper conduct of the de- fendant, or whether the plaintiff himself so far contributed to the misfortune by his own negligence or want of ordi- nary or common care and caution, that but for such negli- gence or want of ordinary care and caution on his part the misfortune would not have occurred.
What to read after Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the ..., volume 2; volume 79?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Kentucky (District). Supreme Court, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Digitized by Googk -VOL. Lxxix.] SEPTEMBER TERM, 1880. 163 Kentucky Central Railroad Company v. Thomas' adm'r.
In the first instruction given for the plaintiff, the court told the jury, in effect, that no fault on the part of the intes- tate, which did not contribute to the wrecking of the train, would authorize a verdict for the defendant, on the ground of contributory negligence, and refused to instruct, as asked by the defendant, that it was the duty of the intestate to •occupy a seat in one... of the passenger coaches, and that if he went voluntarily into the express car, and it was more dangerous to ride in that car than in a passenger car, and that his life was lost in consequence of his being in the •express car, they should find for the defendant.
That the intestate was a passenger, and entitled to the privileges and subject to the duties incident to that relation, is not disputed.
When the defense is contributory negligence, the proper question for the jury is, whether the damage was occasioned entirely by the negligence or improper conduct of the de- fendant, or whether the plaintiff himself so far contributed to the misfortune by his own negligence or want of ordi- nary or common care and caution, that but for such negli- gence or want of ordinary care and caution on his part the misfortune would not have occurred.
What to read after Reports of Civil And Criminal Cases Decided By the ..., volume 2; volume 79?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Kentucky (District). Supreme Court, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
Guest
Read Also
8 / 10
User Reviews: