School Law Bulletin [serial] 9, 4 (Oct 1978)
![Cover School Law Bulletin [serial] 9, 4 (Oct 1978)](https://files.read-any-book.net/433372/files/school-law-bulletin-serial-9-4-oct-1978.jpg)
The book School Law Bulletin [serial] 9, 4 (Oct 1978) was written by author Here you can read free online of School Law Bulletin [serial] 9, 4 (Oct 1978) book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is School Law Bulletin [serial] 9, 4 (Oct 1978) a good or bad book?
Where can I read School Law Bulletin [serial] 9, 4 (Oct 1978) for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read School Law Bulletin [serial] 9, 4 (Oct 1978) Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book School Law Bulletin [serial] 9, 4 (Oct 1978)
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read School Law Bulletin [serial] 9, 4 (Oct 1978) Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book School Law Bulletin [serial] 9, 4 (Oct 1978)
What reading level is School Law Bulletin [serial] 9, 4 (Oct 1978) book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
32. Board of Educ. v. HEW, 396 F. Supp. 203 (S.D. Ohio 1975); P. v. Riles, 343 F. Supp. 1306 (N.D. Cal. 1972), affd, 502 F.2d 963 (9th Cir. 1974); Hobson v. Hansen, 269 F. Supp. 401 (D.D.C. 1967).
See, e.g., Note, The Legal Implications of Cultural Bias in the Intelligence Testing of Disadvantaged School Children, 61 Geo. L. Rev. 1027, 1032- 35 (1973); Note, Limiting the Use of Standardized Intelligence Tests for Ability Grouping in Public Schools, 51 N.C. L. Rev. 1564 (1973).
SCHOOL LAW BULLET...IN matters of educational policy, are unlikely to declare competency testing unconstitutional per se. However, the trial competency test given in North Carolina suggests that the actual test will have a disproportion- ate racial impact. It can be argued that such a result satisfies the first element of proving a prima facie case of a denial of equal protection in an ability-grouping program, i.e., racial imbalance. But the design of the North Carolina competency testing program makes it extremely difficult to establish the other two elements necessary to establish a prima facie denial of equal protection — reliance on scores of a culturally biased test and proof of injury to the student because of per- manent location in a special remedial program.
What to read after School Law Bulletin [serial] 9, 4 (Oct 1978)?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Open Content Alliance to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
32. Board of Educ. v. HEW, 396 F. Supp. 203 (S.D. Ohio 1975); P. v. Riles, 343 F. Supp. 1306 (N.D. Cal. 1972), affd, 502 F.2d 963 (9th Cir. 1974); Hobson v. Hansen, 269 F. Supp. 401 (D.D.C. 1967).
See, e.g., Note, The Legal Implications of Cultural Bias in the Intelligence Testing of Disadvantaged School Children, 61 Geo. L. Rev. 1027, 1032- 35 (1973); Note, Limiting the Use of Standardized Intelligence Tests for Ability Grouping in Public Schools, 51 N.C. L. Rev. 1564 (1973).
SCHOOL LAW BULLET...IN matters of educational policy, are unlikely to declare competency testing unconstitutional per se. However, the trial competency test given in North Carolina suggests that the actual test will have a disproportion- ate racial impact. It can be argued that such a result satisfies the first element of proving a prima facie case of a denial of equal protection in an ability-grouping program, i.e., racial imbalance. But the design of the North Carolina competency testing program makes it extremely difficult to establish the other two elements necessary to establish a prima facie denial of equal protection — reliance on scores of a culturally biased test and proof of injury to the student because of per- manent location in a special remedial program.
What to read after School Law Bulletin [serial] 9, 4 (Oct 1978)?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Open Content Alliance to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
User Reviews: