Statistical Analysis of the Goodness of Classical Factor Analysis Regression Cf

Cover Statistical Analysis of the Goodness of Classical Factor Analysis Regression Cf
Statistical Analysis of the Goodness of Classical Factor Analysis Regression Cf
John Thackery Scott
The book Statistical Analysis of the Goodness of Classical Factor Analysis Regression Cf was written by author Here you can read free online of Statistical Analysis of the Goodness of Classical Factor Analysis Regression Cf book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Statistical Analysis of the Goodness of Classical Factor Analysis Regression Cf a good or bad book?
Where can I read Statistical Analysis of the Goodness of Classical Factor Analysis Regression Cf for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Statistical Analysis of the Goodness of Classical Factor Analysis Regression Cf Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Statistical Analysis of the Goodness of Classical Factor Analysis Regression Cf
What reading level is Statistical Analysis of the Goodness of Classical Factor Analysis Regression Cf book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:


In all cases the bias for the CFAR estimators is consistent and negative, but asymptotically approaches zero as sample size increases. For the largest sample size, the bias of the CFAR estimators when four or more factors are extracted is smaller than the bias of the OLS esti- mator. Using principal components rather than statistical factor analysis gives comparable results. While the bias for factor analysis is equal to or smaller than the bias of principal components, the differences are suff
...iciently small that the extra cost of statistical factor extraction rela- tive to the cost of principal components appears to be greater than the advantage gained.
The second part of Table 16 gives the bias by number of factors ex- tracted and the internal population characteristics. Here the OLS esti- mators also seem to be inconsistent. The CFAR estimators are negatively biased and in general are smallest when there is a high intercorrelation among the variables in the population. There are several cases among these data where the principal components method results in better (smaller bias) estimates than the statistical factor extraction method.


What to read after Statistical Analysis of the Goodness of Classical Factor Analysis Regression Cf?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by John Thackery Scott to read online
MoreLess
10
Tokens
Statistical Analysis of the Goodness of Classical Factor Analysis Regressio...
+Write review

User Reviews:

Write Review:

Guest

Guest