The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristole
The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristole
The book The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristole was written by author Here you can read free online of The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristole book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristole a good or bad book?
Where can I read The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristole for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristole Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristole
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristole Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristole
What reading level is The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristole book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Is it true to say that hcec is that which you say hanc is ? but you • To admit this ^*7 ^* ^^ * shield, kcBc then is a shield. Or is it conclusion. not necessary * if htsBc does not signify par mam, bu t t i. e. not ace, |>ar»ia,f but parmam is hanc. Neither if what but nom. y^^ g^^y. jg ^^j^^ ^^ ^^^ ]^^^ ^^^ g^^^ |j jg QgOU, ^ therefore hie is Cleon,^ hie is not Cleon,^ for it was said, quern aio hunc esse, est hie, non hune; for when the question is thus made it is not according to the rules ...of grammaa*. Do you know hoc ? but this is a stone, you know thea a stone, or does it not signify the same thing in the expression, do you know hoc? and in hoe autem est lapis f but this is a stone f but that in the former it signifies hune and in the latter Me* Num eujus seientiam habes hoe, scisf Habes autem sdentiam iapidis: seis igiiur lapidk; is it not tiiat when you say hujuSy you say kxpidu^ but when you say hoe, lapidem? but it is granted eujus seientiam habes, te seire, non hujus, sed hoc; and therefore turn lofidis, sed lapidem.
What to read after The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristole?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Aristotle to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
Is it true to say that hcec is that which you say hanc is ? but you • To admit this ^*7 ^* ^^ * shield, kcBc then is a shield. Or is it conclusion. not necessary * if htsBc does not signify par mam, bu t t i. e. not ace, |>ar»ia,f but parmam is hanc. Neither if what but nom. y^^ g^^y. jg ^^j^^ ^^ ^^^ ]^^^ ^^^ g^^^ |j jg QgOU, ^ therefore hie is Cleon,^ hie is not Cleon,^ for it was said, quern aio hunc esse, est hie, non hune; for when the question is thus made it is not according to the rules ...of grammaa*. Do you know hoc ? but this is a stone, you know thea a stone, or does it not signify the same thing in the expression, do you know hoc? and in hoe autem est lapis f but this is a stone f but that in the former it signifies hune and in the latter Me* Num eujus seientiam habes hoe, scisf Habes autem sdentiam iapidis: seis igiiur lapidk; is it not tiiat when you say hujuSy you say kxpidu^ but when you say hoe, lapidem? but it is granted eujus seientiam habes, te seire, non hujus, sed hoc; and therefore turn lofidis, sed lapidem.
What to read after The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristole?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Aristotle to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
User Reviews: