Virginia Appeals: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals of ..., volume 15
Virginia Appeals: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals of ..., volume 15
The book Virginia Appeals: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals of ..., volume 15 was written by author Here you can read free online of Virginia Appeals: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals of ..., volume 15 book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Virginia Appeals: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals of ..., volume 15 a good or bad book?
Where can I read Virginia Appeals: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals of ..., volume 15 for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Virginia Appeals: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals of ..., volume 15 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Virginia Appeals: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals of ..., volume 15
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Virginia Appeals: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals of ..., volume 15 Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Virginia Appeals: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals of ..., volume 15
What reading level is Virginia Appeals: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals of ..., volume 15 book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
The numbers of the lots are given." Digitized by Google Harper Et Al v. Wallerstein. 273 So also, in Engler v. Garrett, 100 Md. 387, 397, the court says : "Nor do we think there can be any objection to the contract on the ground of uncertainty. It describes the property as No. 2035 N. Fulton avenue, and further desig- nates it as the property occupied by Samuel S. Linthicum.
This certainly is quite as definite and certain as the descrip- tion we held good- in the case of Kraft et al v. Egwi, 76... Md. 252, where it is said that a decree for specific perform- ance will not be refused merely because the contract does not state in what county or State the lands agreed to be conveyed lie, provided the description of the premises is not thereby rendered altogether indefinite." In Scheible v. Slagle, 89 Ind. 324, syllabi s, it is said: "The office of a description in a deed is not to identify the land conveyed, but to furnish the means of identification; and, when there is a general designation of the property intended to be conveyed, parol evidence is competent to show what property the description covers." And in the opinion, at p.
What to read after Virginia Appeals: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals of ..., volume 15?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals, William Wallace Scott, Maury Baldwin Watts to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
The numbers of the lots are given." Digitized by Google Harper Et Al v. Wallerstein. 273 So also, in Engler v. Garrett, 100 Md. 387, 397, the court says : "Nor do we think there can be any objection to the contract on the ground of uncertainty. It describes the property as No. 2035 N. Fulton avenue, and further desig- nates it as the property occupied by Samuel S. Linthicum.
This certainly is quite as definite and certain as the descrip- tion we held good- in the case of Kraft et al v. Egwi, 76... Md. 252, where it is said that a decree for specific perform- ance will not be refused merely because the contract does not state in what county or State the lands agreed to be conveyed lie, provided the description of the premises is not thereby rendered altogether indefinite." In Scheible v. Slagle, 89 Ind. 324, syllabi s, it is said: "The office of a description in a deed is not to identify the land conveyed, but to furnish the means of identification; and, when there is a general designation of the property intended to be conveyed, parol evidence is competent to show what property the description covers." And in the opinion, at p.
What to read after Virginia Appeals: Decisions of the Supreme Court of Appeals of ..., volume 15?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals, William Wallace Scott, Maury Baldwin Watts to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
Guest
Read Also
8 / 10
User Reviews: