Chicagos Financial Dilemma Reply of the Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency to
Chicagos Financial Dilemma Reply of the Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency to
The book Chicagos Financial Dilemma Reply of the Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency to was written by author Here you can read free online of Chicagos Financial Dilemma Reply of the Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency to book, rate and share your impressions in comments. If you don't know what to write, just answer the question: Why is Chicagos Financial Dilemma Reply of the Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency to a good or bad book?
Where can I read Chicagos Financial Dilemma Reply of the Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency to for free?
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Chicagos Financial Dilemma Reply of the Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency to Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Chicagos Financial Dilemma Reply of the Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency to
In our eReader you can find the full English version of the book. Read Chicagos Financial Dilemma Reply of the Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency to Online - link to read the book on full screen. Our eReader also allows you to upload and read Pdf, Txt, ePub and fb2 books. In the Mini eReder on the page below you can quickly view all pages of the book - Read Book Chicagos Financial Dilemma Reply of the Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency to
What reading level is Chicagos Financial Dilemma Reply of the Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency to book?
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
At the close of that year the surplus was $4, 500, 000.
During each of the years 1914, 1915, and 1916, the City's revenue averaged about $2, 000, 000 more than in 1913. The greatest increase during either of these three years came in 1916, when the amount exceeded that of 1913 by $3, 150, 000 and that of 1915 by about $1, 800, 000.
Definite figures for 1917 are not available, but there is no reason for thinking that the City's income will be reduced materially, if at all, below what it was in 1...916 ; in other words, the 1917 revenue will exceed that of 1913 by more than $3, 000, 000 and that of 1915 by nearly $2, 000, 000. There will be a loss of approximately $550, 000 during the current year on account of the smaller number of saloon licenses but this will be more than offset by an increase in taxation due to increased property valua- tions; by special taxes to cover expenditures for em- ployes' pension funds and for playground purposes; and by $340, 000 diverted from the special assessment unclaimed rebate fund authorized by the last Legislature and used in paying for public improvements.
What to read after Chicagos Financial Dilemma Reply of the Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency to?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Ill Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency Chicago to read onlineMoreLess
To quickly assess the difficulty of the text, read a short excerpt:
At the close of that year the surplus was $4, 500, 000.
During each of the years 1914, 1915, and 1916, the City's revenue averaged about $2, 000, 000 more than in 1913. The greatest increase during either of these three years came in 1916, when the amount exceeded that of 1913 by $3, 150, 000 and that of 1915 by about $1, 800, 000.
Definite figures for 1917 are not available, but there is no reason for thinking that the City's income will be reduced materially, if at all, below what it was in 1...916 ; in other words, the 1917 revenue will exceed that of 1913 by more than $3, 000, 000 and that of 1915 by nearly $2, 000, 000. There will be a loss of approximately $550, 000 during the current year on account of the smaller number of saloon licenses but this will be more than offset by an increase in taxation due to increased property valua- tions; by special taxes to cover expenditures for em- ployes' pension funds and for playground purposes; and by $340, 000 diverted from the special assessment unclaimed rebate fund authorized by the last Legislature and used in paying for public improvements.
What to read after Chicagos Financial Dilemma Reply of the Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency to?
You can find similar books in the "Read Also" column, or choose other free books by Ill Chicago Bureau of Public Efficiency Chicago to read onlineMoreLess
Write Review:
Guest
Read Also
8 / 10
User Reviews: